| A Strong Brand Is
Necessary For B2B Companies
By Wilson Chew
Principal Consultant, StrategiCom
19 Jun 2006
1. Introduction
1.1 What is a brand – Does it Exist for B2B Companies
A brand is nothing more than a perception in the mind.
Let me make it explicit.
(See table 1.1.)
BRAND
|
PERCEPTION |
ROLLS ROYCE
INTEL
IBM
GE
FEDEX
LLOYDS OF LONDON
SUMITOMO
CISCO SYSTEMS
XEROX |
AIRCRAFT ENGINES
POWERFUL PROCESSING CHIPS
NOTEBOOKS FOR BUSINESS
GIANT AMERICAN COMPANY
GLOBAL COURIER
MARINE INSURANCE
GIANT JAPANESE COMPANY
IT NETWORKS
COPIERS |
Table : 1.1 – A Brand and How It Is Perceived In the
Minds of people
I could keep the list going but let’s just look at
the brands above. They are NOT consumer brands. The
perceptions (see right of table), which have been built
over a
long period of time, are as strong as the perceptions
of consumer brands. So the question, “Do brands exist
for B2B Companies?” is irrelevant. The real question,
then, would be “How should a strong B2B brand be built?”.
Smaller B2B companies spend more time trying to survive
as opposed to building long term corporate efforts that
would ensure sustainable growth. This is due to many
factors, such as the lack of resources. The daily struggles
of SMEs are real, considering Singapore’s small domestic
market.
In the last 30 years, there has been an evolution of
the enterprise. With schemes provided by the Government
of Singapore and the collective efforts of various chambers
of commerce, business and trade associations and representative
federations; SMEs in Singapore are growing in size and
expanding rapidly. The more successful ones have already
gone public and global.
1.2 Is there a Need to Build a Business Brand?
While successful companies are prominent, the brand-building
aspect of the SME poses a real and present struggle.
Companies would first ask if their marketing budgets
reap direct Returns-on-Investment (ROI); if it were
to be unclear, they would rather invest funds for direct
client spending because it cultivates relationships.
That is indeed a fact and these efforts do have their
merits. Would a customer make a huge purchase just because
a few salesmen bought him “a few drinks”? Well, the
customer could award contracts but it would be based
commonly on 2 reasons:-
i. if the seller has a strong brand reputation;
ii. if the seller has a price lower than the market’s
average.
Wining and dining has its place and role, but so does
brand reputation. This paper is not intended to articulate
the importance of business relationship building and
its importance to a successful organisation. It is to
articulate that one of the most critical factors is
brand reputation and the worthy cause of building it
strong.
2. The Risks Your Customers Deal With
2.1 Technical Risk
Every time your clients buy, they first think, evaluate
and scrutinize before making a decision. Remember, you
are not dealing with a can of coke which costs a mere
80 cents. Buying a B2B product or service could be a
decision costing millions and EVEN MORE IF YOUR PRODUCT
DOESN’T PERFORM. If your brand is ranked No.1 or No.2
in its category, your customers will buy from you even
if the product is not perfect. Why is that so? Well,
simply because even if it fails, it is still the recognised
No.1 or No.2 brand. But if your brand is ranked No.10,
even though you may have the most cutting-edge product,
no customer will buy it. Why the irony? Well, simply
because it’s not the No.1 or No.2. So truth doesn’t
work, perception does.
When IBM created the OS/2 WARP operating system many
years ago, it was viewed by technology experts around
the world as an operating system far more superior than
Microsoft OS. IBM, then, believed that a product superiority
strategy would propel the growth of the company. Microsoft
on the other hand went about building their brand in
an effort to dominate the operating system category
in the minds of PC users and manufacturers. The rest
is history. While IBM may have had a far more superior
product, the technical risk in buying OS2 WARP was viewed
as significant because it would have been incompatible
with most other Microsoft-driven systems. Take a minute
and ask yourself:-
a. if your product can outdo the market leader in terms
of technology and other unique selling propositions,
why isn’t your brand No.1?; and
b. if you have to buy a product for your company, would
you buy the
recognised leading brand?
Build your brand reputation and make it indispensable1
to an extent that if a customer buys from you, he deems
it to be good technical risk management.
2.2 Financial Risk
One of the many considerations of a huge corporate
buy is the level of investment, and financial loss if
the product bought encounters malfunctions. Imagine
a huge township developer or a government raising a
request-for-proposal (RFP) for the construction of a
huge power plant; one which would power 50,000 households
and factories. One can also imagine the level of investment
which the Client would be making and catastrophic effects
in the event of a power failure. So the more confident
the Client is towards a particular contractor in the
knowledge that there would be minimal failure (taking
into account experience, expertise and technology),
the more likely the Client would award the contract
to that particular contractor. What more if the contractor
has a brand reputation of little or zero failures in
previous projects? So, financial risks are often considerations
of the corporate buying process.
Build your brand to a level where if a client decides
against awarding a contract to you, the Client would
perceivably face huge financial risks.
2.3 Service Risk
All customers want good service. There is a huge perception
that if a brand is No.1, the service experience is also
No.1. However, as we all know, that may not always be
the case. Several years ago, I bought a laptop. The
promise upon purchase was a one-day turnaround repair
service should the machine break down. True enough,
one day it did. I brought it to the service centre and
they took 2 weeks; and even after 2 weeks, the problem
wasn’t entirely solved. Following that grueling experience,
the outcome was simple: I never again bought equipment
from that particular brand; laptop or any other product.
It’s been almost 10 years on and I now own an IBM notebook.
Personally, the experience I’ve derived with the IBM
laptop is two-fold:-
· the machine rarely stalls;
· the after-sales service is swift.
In the above personal experience, it involved a singular
business user, a buying decision which involved no-more
than $3000.00, the purchase of a business notebook and
a PC manufacturer.
Now imagine a purchase of a server connecting thousands
in a hospital or a system connecting petrol-stations
across a country. Corporate buyers not only consider
product superiority, they consider the service reaction
standards too.The risk of poor service does not resonate
well with corporate buyers.
Build a brand known for its service. Bad service kills
a brand.
2.4 Professional Risk
In modern day management, systems and integration is
critical to the success of an organisation. In some
organisations, technology systems form the backbone
of the entire organisation. Such examples include banks,
airlines and even logistics. Failure of products, services
and systems compromises the professional standing of
your customers. In some cases, such systems may be deemed
as the cause of malpractice on your customers’ part.
So here’s the catch, build a brand which would help
build the professional standing of your customers because
efforts to lower professional risk is good risk management.
2.5 Delivery Risk
One of the biggest and most common problems of renovation
contractors in Singapore is delivery. When projects
are not delivered on time, it prevents your customers
from operating on schedule. Down time is always rendered
as foregone profits. But greater is the loss of reputation
than just mere profits. Profit loss can be recouped
over time; but once a brand is tarnished, brand reputation
is lost forever.
This is also the same reason why, especially in the
home and office renovations industry, reputed brands
who charge premium rates consistently win larger projects.
Companies cannot afford for their business to be affected
by the non-delivery of vendors. As a petroleum client
once shared with me, “If our driller pumps a day late,
we would lose almost $1 Million a day”.
Clients buy brands because they cannot afford to be
late; and they will not even risk it.
3. You Reap What You Sow
Many business owners think that salesmanship and marketing
are enough to succeed in business. That’s a sad business
misconception!
Building a strong business brand is an integral part
of your organisational strategy. It goes beyond how
you interact with clients, prospects, vendors, employees,
and anyone else with whom you come in contact. Branding
creates a perception in the minds of your customers;
as Robin Fisher Roffer points out in her excellent book,
Make a Name for Yourself, "if you don't brand yourself,
someone else will".
An excellent example of branding is an electrical contractor
with whom I worked with recently while renovating the
new office. Their main goal many years ago was to become
known as the safest electricians in their field so they
could work in the upper-paying customer segment. When
the family of three started, they were tempted to work
with a “just complete the project” attitude so that
more contracts could be acquired at lower prices. They
were trying to survive. This would have been inconsistent
with their goal of being the safest-electricians, at
that time; I encouraged them to avoid this tactic (even
without being their appointed brand consultants).
It wasn't easy to lose bids to competitors who were
using low-quality materials and skipping steps, but
the family-enterprise stood firm. Eventually, it paid
off and today, several years on, they are enjoying contracts
which involve the setting up of electrical cabling projects
for fairly large buildings. This company is also on
the verge of being listed on the Singapore Exchange.
They have achieved their goal, by remaining true to
what they believe should propel their business, and
by creating a strong brand.
The seeds of ‘lower number of contracts and quality
work’ harvested ‘higher number of high value contracts’
today. Remember, you reap what you sow. If you sow the
seeds of ‘my product is superior and will sell itself’
then you will harvest ‘low margin’ fruits.
4. How Corporate Brand Positioning can influence
The Corporate Decision
Table 1.1 clearly showed that you can build a brand
to a level where it is synonymous with a category. However,
I am often asked, “How can the expense of brand building
be measured to returns?” In short, there are two answers,
the “financial” answer and the “influence” answer.
In the interest of this paper, we shall deal only with
the “influence” aspect.
The process of a corporate buy is broadly segregated
into 4 parts:-
· Finding the Right Fit
· Request-for-Proposal (RFP)
· Selection
· Governance
4.1 Finding the Right Fit
Every outsourcing vendor (and I am sure you do too)
promises cost savings, but what is critical for your
customers is VALUE; defined by how their goals are best
met. But what has this to do with your brand? Well,
if you had a reputable brand which communicates the
promises of how best their needs and goals are met,
the battle is half won.
4.2. Request-for-Proposal (RFP)
An RFP is more than a request for a proposal; it is
a request for PARTNERSHIP. At this stage, your proposal
must not only meet the technical specifications of the
RFP; your people must represent the (product or corporate)
brand when delivering or presenting the bid. Your brand
must represent the quality of the final deal. The stronger
the value propositions of the brand, the higher the
probability of winning.
4.3 Vendor Selection
It is reflected in most procurement and outsourcing
textbooks that buyers will traditionally consider the
following at this stage:-
· industry expertise;
· demonstration of reliability;
· a good track record;
· Flexibility;
· “Just plain old TRUST”
But wait! Don’t they consider cost? Well, some market
research scientists will tell you that the more critical
the project, the lesser the cost consideration. In short,
customers will pay top dollar for best-of-class expectations.
Note also that all 5 points above are critical components
to brand building. Remember, a brand is a perception
driven by values and performance; it is NOT merely a
logo.
4.4 Governance
Buyers do spend time and resources in managing an outsourcing
relationship, some argue as high as 8% of total contract
costs. Such costs are incurred for performance measurement,
process or technology improvements, and transitional
assistance. So governance has a tangible cost.
According to Linder, the associate director for Accenture's
Institute for High Performance Business, “ongoing Governance
and associated costs can be managed effectively if buyers
have metrics and incentives in place. To be sure, metrics
force executives and employees to focus on the details”2.
In short, the customer has to set aside resources to
keep time while the seller has to live up to its brand
promise and project deliverables.
When companies manage the governance measures set in
place by buyers, they are sub-consciously building brand
reputation. A customer’s testimony to compliance far
outweighs any form of advertising.
5. Conclusion - A Strong Brand Is Necessary For
B2B Companies
In this paper, we have argued two points:-
· when a customer buys, a customer considers risks
and the brand which provides good risk management as
part of its brand values and promises, wins;
· there is brand influence in the process of a corporate
buy. The higher the value of the buy, the higher the
influence of the brand.
At the annual Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas
early this year, Intel officially unveiled its new logo.
It dropped the 'e' logo and 'Intel Inside' tagline.
The new logo embodies a slightly more digital looking
'Intel' and the new motto 'Leap Ahead'. This is the
first time it has changed since the company began some
37 years ago.
According to Business Week’s Top 100 Global Brands
Scoreboard3, Intel is also rated as the world's fifth
most recognisable brand and the new look reflects the
new position of Intel as a leading-edge platform developer
rather than just a manufacturer of processors. The decision
to implement a change in marketing follows the just
under a year ago. This move had, in turn, been prompted
by the success of the Centrino mobile platform for wireless
notebooks.
This example is a very clear reason why business-to-business
companies must focus on building strong brands. It is
the baseline and propeller of business direction and
sustainability.
If you have any questions or comments about this
article, please e-mail me at wilson.chew@strategicom.com.
I would be most happy to discuss them with you.
|